JRF-RRC Unification Proposal Summary

Keddem president Hayley Green Smith sent the following message to Keddem members on March 8. We repost it here to seed and to encourage discussion. JRF hosted a webinar on March 13; we have the slides presented during that webinar, available on the Keddem Web site (as an Acrobat document, and as a PowerPoint 2007 document; we are aware that there are some minor formatting problems with the PowerPoint document when viewed using some PowerPoint-compatible software).

Please post your comments to this proposal, here in the blog. If you do not yet have a login to the blog, please register (link at left, and here). If you have difficulties, contact the Keddem WebRebs via WebReb at Keddem dot org (make the obvious changes to the email address)


JRF and RRC are proposing to merge, with RRA’s full support. There will be a vote of the JRF affiliates at a special meeting in Phildaelphia on April 10, with an information webinar planned for this Sunday, March 13, at 1pm PDT (information for joining that webinar is below). Keddem’s membership and Board need to provide direction for Keddem’s delegates and proxies regarding how they should vote on this extremely important topic. Keddem’s Board encourages Keddem members to participate in the webinar, and is planning a time for discussion among the membership.

Please continue reading for additional information and links to more background and details.

Jewish communal organizations, such as congregations and movements, are facing huge changes in the way people are viewing organized religion and religious communities. The organizations that comprise the Reconstructionist Movement—JRF, RRC (the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College) and RRA (the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association)—believe that a fundamental restructuring of the Movement is required to serve the Jewish Community as we continue into the 21st century.

JRF, RRC, and RRA together have developed a plan to allow the Reconstructionist Movement to address these changes. This plan is being presented to the JRF affiliates (congregations and havurot), and will be the topic of a special plenary meeting of the JRF to be held in Philadelphia on April 10 at 1pm EDT. Keddem will be voting at that meeting (both in-person and proxy voting is provided for in the official meeting announcement). Keddem delegates and proxies need instructions for that vote.

A webinar on this topic [occurred] Sunday, March 13, at 1pm PDT; see below.

Following is information about the proposal; the Board is scheduling an opportunity for community discussion.

The proposal

JRF and RRC are proposing to merge, with RRA’s full support.

To effect the merger, RRC will assume JRF’s financial responsibilities; the new, unified organization will be built by the RRC, JRF, and RRA leadership and members. This new organization will use the current RRC Board of Governors as its initial governing body, and both JRF and RRA will participate fully in the governance. The goal of the new, unified organization will be to “cultivate, enhance, and promote Jewish leadership, learning, and living.”

The unification proposal was presented to the JRF and RRC boards on February 6, 2011, with the statement, “this proposal holds out great promise for a new series of opportunities, creative explorations, and the advancement of the contributions to Jewish life that our our movement has made and will continue to make in the future.”

Why the proposal is being considered

The purpose of unifying JRF and RRC is to address the dramatic changes occurring in the Jewish community, specifically in how younger adults (those in their 20′s and 30′s) are viewing and responding to organized religion. These changes affect everything from concepts of membership to dues, from events to fundraising, from inreach to outreach, from governance to affiliation and identity.

The vote, and information dissemination

At the special plenary meeting in April, affiliated communities will vote, by delegate and by proxy, on the unification proposal. This will not be a working session to refine, hone, change, or overhaul the current proposal: it will be a vote to approve or not to approve the current proposal. Discussion about the proposal in order to clarify details will occur, but the proposal will be considered as presented.

In order to inform JRF affiliates’ members, there [was] a webinar on Sunday, March 13, at 1pm PDT.

How the unification will affect JRF, RRC, and RRA

JRF will cease to exist if the proposal is approved. RRC will be transformed into more than just a rabbinical college (while retaining both its accreditation as an academic institution and its not-for-profit educational institution status), and will become the organization that addresses both the educating of Reconstructionist Jewish professionals and the needs of Reconstructionist communities. RRA will remain an independent organization, in order to address the specific needs of Reconstructionist rabbis.

What if the proposal is not approved?

That is not specifically addressed in the information from JRF et al. Most likely is that JRF, RRC, and RRA will continue as they have been. If the changes being seen have the anticipated effect, the Reconstructionist Movement as it currently is structured will become less relevant, less viable, and less able to support its affiliates, their members, and other constituencies of the Movement.

If the proposal is not approved, there will be an opportunity to introduce “any lawful resolution addressing the discussions with the RRC and RRA or the structure and governance of JRF.”

If the proposal is approved, what will the new organization be called?

The interim working name for the new organization is “The Jewish Reconstructionist Movement.” (Call this the JRM, for convenience.) The final name will be determined by the new organization.

Initial governance structure of the JRM

RRC’s Board of Governors will provide initial governance structure for JRM. That Board will be augmented with additional members; current JRF Board members are specifically encouraged to consider joining. Additional governance organizations will include the following.

  1. A Congregational Services Committee, whose chair will serve on the new board.
  2. A Youth and Education Commission, whose chair will serve on the new board.
  3. A Movement Growth and Financial Health Commission, whose chair will serve on the new board.
  4. A Tikkun Olam Commission, whose chair will serve on the new board.
  5. The chair of the Jewish Reconstructionist Camping Corporation (“JRCC,” the corporate body that runs Camp JRF, currently, in effect, a subsidiary of JRF).

The chairs of the Congregational Services Committee and the JRCC will, further, serve on the new organization’s Executive Committee.

A committee will also be established to work with the Bylaws Committee to develop any necessary charter amendments, new bylaws, and other governance procedures to enable the new, unified organization to fulfill its mission.

A “Movement Advisory Committee” will be created as soon as feasible. This committee will include leadership from among current JRF affiliated communities, members elected by the RRA, the chair of the unified organization, and the chief executive officer of the unified organization. This committee will consult with and be consulted by the new organization and its various committees about the organization’s mission, operations, decisions, initiatives, strategies, priorities, governance, branding, and marketing.

How does this affect Keddem?

If the proposal for unification is approved, Keddem will become an affiliate of the Jewish Reconstructionist Movement.

What will happen to associated organizations, like Harmoniyah and Camp JRF?

In the specific case of Camp JRF–i.e., the Jewish Reconstructionist Camping Corporation–it will become part of JRM. In the case of Harmoniyah, RENA, and CEDAR, representatives from RRC and JRF are or will be discussing the implications of the unification with the appropriate organizational leaders.

Effects on JRF staff

The JRM is committed to structure staffing to provide at least an equal level of services to the affiliated communities as that provided in the current JRF budget. Though no commitments can be made to or about specific staff members, the organization is aware of the need to address the people-related issues of this restructuring.

Expected timeline

The vote at the plenary meeting of the JRF, instructing the JRF Board to continue with the unification negotiations, occurred November 12, 2010 at Convention.

On February 6, 2011, the negotiating team (from JRF, RRC, and RRA) presented their proposal to the JRF and RRC boards. The JRF Board of Directors unanimously approved this proposal on February 7; the RRC Board of Governors overwhelmingly approved it on February 8, and the RRA Board of Directors unanimously endorsed the proposal on February 11.

An informational webinar for members of JRF affiliates [was] held on on Sunday, March 13, at 1pm PDT, as noted above.

A special meeting of the JRF Plenum will be held on April 10 for the purposes of voting on the proposal, as noted above.

If the proposal is approved, the various new committees will be formed as soon as practical, to report back to the new board by August 31, 2012 with their recommendations for programs, priorities, structural and governance changes, etc.

Ideally, by the end of 2011, the final steps of the reorganization (other than the planned ongoing work of the various committees) will be complete and the new organization will become operative. It is possible that these final steps will not be completed until 2012, though.

Where can I get more background and details?

The JRF Web site (http://www.JRF.org) has both background and details. Specifically, see

http://www.jrf.org/files/RRC-JRF_Unification_at_a_Glance.pdf

for a summary, and

http://www.jrf.org/files/United_Organization_Documents.pdf

for much more extensive background and detailed information.

What’s next for Keddem?

Keddem’s leadership wants your feedback. Please go to this link to provide your feedback about the unification. We also want to know if there is enough interest in scheduling a meeting to have a community discussion, please use the survey to indicate your interest.

Keddem’s delegates and proxies will be instructed to vote in accordance with the desires of the membership and the direction of the Board.

Long Range Planning Discussion Salons Summary

There were a total of seven salons and 54 people attended. While each group was different and had its own emotional quality, many people expressed some variation on the sentiment that the salons “felt like the beginning of a new community at Keddem.”  In some of the salons a lot of excitement and energy was created as we talked about future possibilities. In other salons people openly wept as they told stories of how they had been hurt, but felt that telling the story in the small safe group was the beginning of a long delayed healing for them. Not all of the salons had time to address all of the questions.

The short summary of the discussions is:

1) We want a multigenerational synagogue

While there were many concerns about the logistics, implementation, monetary and resource costs of starting a school, the majority of the salon participants were overwhelmingly enthusiastic about creating some kind of multigenerational synagogue. There seemed to be the most enthusiasm for learning experiences that both adults and children (not just families) could share together. There was a lot of consensus that we need to find a way to do this and do it successfully, without diluting the richness of our Judaism for adults, compromising our financial security, or burning out our volunteers.

2) We want to become more of a sacred/spiritual community with more meaningful emotional experiences.

There was significant enthusiasm for a better balance of heart and soul with the intellect. Many people spoke of spiritual experiences that they had away from Keddem and they wished they could have at Keddem. There were many, many comments expressing that people wanted more spirituality, although a few people felt that they liked Keddem fine the way it was.  People also wanted a safe place for more emotional experiences, although many commented that Keddem is not yet such a safe place.

3) We want to get to know each other more deeply in small groups.

People were excited about the possibility of gathering in small affinity groups, or Jewish Journey groups.  These groups would deepen our Jewish connection to each other and to passions we have in common. Some of the ideas for such groups were: movies, theater, folk dancing, crafts, saving the planet, the spirituality of the outdoors, music, travel, wine, food, arts and sciences.

4) Many of us have been hurt and so withdrawn from participating or volunteering at because of the treatment we received or witnessed.

In response to our inquiry about people’s experience of a nastiness problem, many people told disturbing, upsetting stories of something that had happened to them or something that they had witnessed. Some people even broke down in tears as they describe their experiences. Many of the stories ended up with some version of “and that’s why I backed away from participating at Keddem” or “that’s why I don’t volunteer any more at Keddem.”  However several people also said that after their experience in the salon, they would reconsider that decision. Several people expressed hope that we would be able to change our culture to one of support, compassion, interest and gratitude for what each of us brings to the creation of Keddem.

How to confront unkind acts with kindness and compassion – A HHD workshop

All of us want to be part of warm and welcoming communities, and to do our part to create them.  But even bright people with good intentions can miss the mark.  That’s what t’shuvah (repentance or returning) is all about.  In many areas of our lives, including at Keddem we want to return to civility, mutual respect and self-respect.  We have often forgotten, and need to remember, to treat each other in a manner that is in harmony with the divine spirit in each of us, the spirit that leads us to become the best we each can be.  This means confronting the behaviors that threaten our intention to be a holy community.  We will focus on how to respond to each other with mutual respect, compassion, and support, when we witness a behavior which is not in line with our values. These practices will not only help Keddem stay true to its values, but will help us carry those values into all areas of our lives in the coming year.

Survey #3 results – Next steps

Thank you so much everyone for your continued involvement in this process. 103 people responded to the most recent survey.  From your comments, and your high level of responses on our surveys, we can tell that people deeply and passionately care about Keddem.  Your responses provided clarity and highlighted issues for deeper and more nuanced conversation (we’ll publish a more detailed summary separately). Therefore we will be organizing several meetings in people’s homes in the last two weeks of October. A significant majority of you enthusiastically supported both of the first two options “innovative and exciting programs for adults” and “expand programs for all ages, add a school and grow”. These two options are virtually tied. On the other hand, all of the other options were soundly rejected. We will be conducting research into the attractiveness of a Reconstructionist approach to children’s religious education, parallel to the in person conversations we plan to have at the meetings. If you know of any families with children who would be willing to talk to us or answer our surveys about what they want for their children’s Jewish education, please contact me at LRP_chair@Keddem.org.

Summary of the 7 possibilities

I am posting this summary, so everyone can comment on the group as a whole, including possibilities we missed.

#1: Maintain our size with innovative, exciting programs for adults
#2: Expand programming for all ages, add a school and grow
#3: Become an umbrella for a mosaic of groups each doing Judaism in its own way
#4: Change to a Reform congregation
#5: Change to a mostly social group
#6: Plan to shrink and conserve costs as we age
#7: Keddem closes

Seven Possibilities for the Future of Keddem

We have surfaced seven possible futures for Keddem which cover the wide range of opinion within the community. The likelihood of realizing any of them depends on how many members share each vision, and how much members are willing to help to make each vision a reality. Please comment and let us know your thoughts. Also, please take the next survey.

Possibility #1: Maintain our size with innovative, exciting programs for adults

We keep all of what is currently best about Keddem while returning to the excitement of our founding by reintroducing a focus on creativity and innovation. We emphasize providing a warm, friendly, compassionate community, with unique activities for adults of all ages. We create new structures to foster innovation in our programs. We maintain our current size or grow slightly.

Possibility #2: Expand programming for all ages, add a school and grow

Keddem becomes a model of innovative, intellectually challenging, Reconstructionist programming for all ages. We have programs targeted to singles, young families, children, teens, adults, interfaith couples, interracial couples, gays, lesbians, theists, and atheists. We plan to grow substantially over the next three to five years. Keddem evolves into a full service synagogue which focuses equally on the intellectual, the emotional and the spiritual in programming. This includes a religious school with a focus on arts and sciences to fill a missing niche in Bay area religious school programming.

Possibility #3: Become an umbrella for a mosaic of groups each doing Judaism in its own way

Keddem becomes an umbrella organization for groups that run their events as they wish. Groups could come together to support larger efforts such High Holy Days, Passover or the creation of a school. Members are free to join the events of any group, but each group defines the rules including food rules, and the level of traditional observance at its events. New groups are free to form and try new things without needing to get permission from anyone to do what they want in the way they want.

Possibility #4: Change to a Reform congregation

We acknowledge that our focus is changing away from an emphasis on traditional services, Torah and Text study, and community observance of the mitzvot. Many of our members are interested in more of a Reform style synagogue. In recognition of this reality, we change to a Reform congregation. If a school is added to this option, growth may be substantial. However there are other successful reform communities in Palo Alto so we would need to find ways to differentiate ourselves.